Keywords; college research topics, chiropractic books, ankle joint pain, sacroiliac joint inflammation.
This is a page where students may find interesting research ideas from the great pool of doctors in the field.
Chiropractors are invited to submit their ideas via CONTACT, things that puzzle them, and they wish someone would research the topic. Perhaps some of them have already been done.
Dr James Winterstein from NUHS has timeously reminded us, quoting Charles Pierce to question.
What we believe, must be true simply
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
- Albert Einstein.
The transition from trust in rigid dogma, to blind belief that every pearl that fell from a Palmer's tongue, to the age of reason and finally to the scientific method has been no easy passage for me, and I suspect for many chiropractors trained in the days before the great explosion of scientific research.
I for one no longer fear the scientific method. It has validated many of our Chiropractic beliefs, but yes it has knocked some sacred cows. But if we are basing our treatment on that which is false, in effect a lie.
So, doctors in the field, please submit the things that puzzle you, and would like to see researched to college research topics via contact.
Reading both medical and chiropractic literature one is continually reminded of the importance of integrity in reporting. Using murky science to back up an opinion, rather than formulating our opinions based on honest science reporting, leads only us and our professions into disrepute.
It would be fascinating to find out whether two groups of patients treated identically responded differently, and stayed with the chiropractic programme differently, if given a copy of Dr Sportelli's marvellous book Introduction to chiropractic.
So many folk at the gym get neck and arm pain from doing pull down? But what's the incidence, and what are the possible mechanisms?
There's anecdotal evidence that manipulation of joints with distraction causes deterioration of the hyaline cartilage; frequency would be a factor too.
Who is going to research whether those who pop their own necks more than say five times a day develop more degenerative change in the joints of Luschka than a control group with also with pain, but consult a chiropractor? And is the progression to a full blown brachial neuralgia more frequent?
Almost every second patient in many chiropractic clinics is suffering from lumbar spondylosis. It comes in the main from only lower back injuries that were not well managed and rehabilitated. Joints that are not in motion become arthritic.
Medical researchers have now proved conclusively that sacroiliac joint inflammation is a major cause of lower lumbar back pain, including pain radiating to the lower leg. Results with infiltration of the joint are reasonably impressive. What researcher is going to come up with college research topics that prove that Chiropractic can get better results, more safely, and more cheaply?
Read more about SACROILIAC JOINT INFLAMMATION ...
I treat the CTS with considerable success but there is no (to my knowledge) research confirming the effectiveness of Chiropractic for CTS.
My treatment protocol:
"Where there is much desire to learn, here of necessity will be much arguing, much writing, many opinions; for opinion in good men is but knowledge in the making."
John Milton, 1608 - 1674
MP is a not uncommon finding in general practice, with pain and sensory changes in the upper thigh. Classically thought to be an impingement of the LFCN in the groin (with its first cousin the Femoral n. producing a similar unnamed syndrome but with possible motor changes) it has virtually no confident treatment protocol in the medical or chiropractic worlds.
Yet a chiropractic protocol addressing the groin, the sacroiliac joint and the upper lumbar spine (in my experience) is particularly successful in treating this very disabling condition.
But who is going to be the first to confirm it? Perhaps not the place for a College Research Topic, however simply measuring the incidence of MP in the chiropractic clinic would be an important start.
Whilst there is now strong Chiropractic research confirming that both a high-velocity, low-amplitude adjustment and Cox traction are safe and significantly more effective than medication in the treatment of chronic LBP in the patient over 55, there is no research confirming how safe and effective that treatment is in the elderly patient.
I would dearly love to see someone do a blinded RCT comparing the Thompson Drop high-velocity, low-amplitude protocol, with and without a home exercise program, with a conservative medication protocol, in the 70 + patient.
A suitable outcome measure might use the Roland Morris disability
Questionaire, the Fear Avoidance Back Questionaire of current
disability, the VAS pain severity questionaire and the the physical
function SF-36 questionaire.
Chiropractic Research ...
The Slump test is probably the orthopaedic test that I use most frequently on a daily basis. However it does invite certain questions that to my knowledge have not been answered. Read more about the Slump Test ...
In particular, why does the Slump Test sometimes produce a result quite different, and even contradicting the classic Lasgues and Braggards?
Do you have some of your own puzzling questions to contribute to College Research Topics?
What is the association between sacro-iliac fixation and hip arthritis? Is it circumstantial? Is SI-fixation a causative factor as is Leg Length Inequality? Could it be an underlying factor in the failed hip operation. Can failed hip surgery (in terms of pain and disability) respond to SI mobilisation?
Secondly, what is the incidence of Femero Acetabular Impingement Syndrome - stiff, unsymptomatic hips in the young person? Does it lead inexorably to arthritis and an orthotic? Can Chiropractic management, and a change of behaviour, alter this course?
I treat symptomatic FAIS, arthritic and post-surgical hips with considerable success, but I am uncertain of the claims I am making. I believe them to be true, but I would like to see some objective research confirming those beliefs.
Whilst some of this is perhaps for the more experienced practitioner, I believe there is a place for such questions within a College Research Topics column.
To my knowledge there is little research confirming the contribution that Chiropractic can make to the second phase of treatment of Ankle Joint fracture.
Recently I have been astounded how well a patient in a very serious ankle joint pain CaseFile responded to the basic principles of Chiropractic, as applied to the ankle. But can those reliably be predicted?
Why is that the standard Lasegue's test, with its associated Braggards, quite often produces conflicting results when compared with the Slump test?
A scoliotic patient whom I had been treating for six months for chronic low back made this statement: "When I first consulted you I never told you that I suffered terribly every month with menstral cramps and was in fact on the verge of a hysterectomy. My cramps and heavy bleeding have almost returned to normal to the extent that both I and my gynaecologist now agree that a medical procedure will no longer be necessary. Is it a coincidence that this has happened at the same time as starting chiropractic care?"
Of course I assured her it was certainly no coincidence. I certainly believe that to be true, but am I being disingenuous? Is that statement based on belief or scientifically proven fact?
Please submit your questions to COLLEGE RESEARCH TOPICS via CONTACT.
The first year in practice is often what will make or break a young chiropractor. Good mentoring, solid back up, plenty of experience ...
It's vital for any new graduate to start out well, under the guidance of a caring, compassionate clinic director. Some are overbearing, motivated in the main by greed...
The statistics obviously can be manipulated to falsify the result. It's for example a sad fact that the only research (as far as I know, please inform me if you know otherwise) confirming that Glucosamine Chondroitine sulphate are effective have been funded by the companies that make the products. Damn lies statistics abound in the research domain... DAMN LIES STATISTICS ...
Likewise researchers who came up results calling for alterating the cholesterol levels at which statins should be prescribed, never declared their conflict of interest. The received funding from drug companies that manufacture the drugs.
Many insurance companies now only pay for physical therapists to provide a chiropractic adjustment; that's in the face of powerful research proving that inclusion of DCs to perform their own technique would save them a good deal of money. One has to conclude that political medicine has gone off on another tack to contain our profession.
It's being successful with some doctors of chiropractic quitting. Others become involved in some dodgy practices, like demanding that patients sign up for a whole year of treatment in advance, in order to stay in business.
In recessionary times, the going is tough when the insurance won't pay.
Is the day approaching for a new Wilk versus the AMA and the insurance companies?
The chiropractic profession has tried hard to stay on the moral high ground; those who stoop to unscrupulous practices need to be exposed and disciplined if we are not to stoop to the low blows that medicine has often resorted to contain and eliminate us.
Chiropractic Books.com and its two sister sites Chiropractic Help.com and Bernard Preston.com bring you plenty of information about new books, care of the body, and healthy living tips from your own vegetable and fruit gardening, to flaxseed for omega 3 and much more.