Subscribe To This Site
XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

Home
What's new
Inspirational Books
Educational Books
Medical Books
Leadership books
Anatomy Books
History books
Continuing Educn
Education
DVDs
Contact Us
Chiropractic Therapy
Posters
Courses
What is Chiropractic
Research
Golden Rules
Leg Length
Chiro Pamphlet
Legal rights
Office Software
Orthopaedics
Immobilisatn Arthr
Professionalism
Exercise
HIP

WILK vs AMA

Antitrust Legislation

Wilk vs AMA

Some thirty years ago, Chester Wilk and three other chiropractors took the American Medical Association to court under the American Antitrust legislation.

After 11 long years, federal court Judge Getzendanner found the AMA guilty of an illegal conspiracy to destroy Chiropractic. The aim inter alia was to maintain the monopoly that Medicine had on healthcare in the USA.

They did this for example by carefully holding back research proving that Chiropractic was twice as effective as Medicine in treating injured workers.

They even went as far as to subvert official state efforts to establish just how effective Chiropractic is.

Judge Getzendanner's ruling

In the case of Wilk vs American Medical Association, the judge ruled that the AMA, and its cohorts, were guilty of having conspired to destroy Chiropractic, thus violating the Sherman antitrust laws.

They did this by making interprofessional cooperation impossible under the guise of being 'unethical', concealing evidence of the effectiveness of Chiropractic, and conductive an enormous disinformation programme to discredit Chiropractic in order to maintain their monopoly.

By claiming that Chiropractors were Quacks and that Chiropractic is unscientific, despite having full access to the Workman's Compensation finding that Chiropractic was twice as effective as Medicine in treating certain musculo-skeletal conditions, the AMA went relentlessly about its illegal campaign to destroy all opposition.

Summary

Judge Susan Getzendanner issued an injunction preventing the American Medical Association from “restricting, regulating or impeding or aiding and abetting others from restricting, regulating, or impeding the freedom of any AMA members or any institution or hospital to make an individual decision as to whether or not that AMA member, institution, or hospital shall professionally associate with chiropractors, chiropractic students, or chiropractic institutions.”

Return from Wilk vs AMA to CHIROPRACTIC HISTORY BOOKS

Monthly Newsletter - sign up here.

Enter your E-mail Address
Enter your First Name (optional)
Then

Don't worry -- your e-mail address is totally secure.
I promise to use it only to send you Great Reads.

footer for WILK vs AMA page